1. Bench pickup check
Start with representative parts, including the worst expected surface condition. Check pickup contact, peel risk, air gap, and any stacked-part behavior before approving the gripper concept.
← Back to Products
Magnetic EOAT
End-of-arm magnetic tooling modules for robots, cobots, gantries, and custom automation equipment.
Target Buyer:Best for robot integrators and OEMs that need a complete magnetic tooling package instead of a loose magnet only.
Capability Highlights
- Configured as part of the full end effector
- Adapter plates, cables, and pole layout can be customized
- Designed around workpiece and robot constraints
Typical Applications
- Automotive part transfer
- Press tending
- Sheet metal cells
- Custom automation lines
Engineering Focus
- Robot flange, adapter plate, and payload moment
- Cable protection, quick-change needs, and signal routing
- Part pickup, movement, and release sequence
- Service access and maintenance expectations
Magnetic EOAT Buyer Decision Framework
Treat magnetic eoat as a complete handling decision, not a stand-alone magnet purchase. The right choice depends on whether the workpiece can be held magnetically, whether the robot motion keeps enough margin, whether the part releases cleanly, and whether the installation scope is clear enough for quotation.
Buyer fit: Best for robot integrators and OEMs that need a complete magnetic tooling package instead of a loose magnet only. Before comparing price, align the practical constraints below so the quote reflects the real automation cell instead of a generic catalog condition.
| Decision Area | Buyer Question | Practical Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Workpiece fit | Can the magnetic poles contact enough real surface area under production conditions? | Send robot brand, model, payload class, flange standard, and controller generation plus photos or drawings of the pickup face. |
| Motion margin | Will the gripper hold through acceleration, rotation, off center pickup, and stop conditions? | Review eoat mass because robot payload and moment checks must include the complete tooling stack. |
| Release behavior | Can the part release within the placement tolerance without residual magnetism, double pickup, or stack disturbance? | Define sample acceptance criteria around interface scope and record the release test result before batch release. |
| Interface scope | Are the flange, adapter, cable, connector, controller, and documentation assumptions included in the same RFQ? | Confirm robot flange, adapter plate, and payload moment and list any custom mounting or control requirements before PO release. |
Validation Plan Before product selection
2. Robot-path check
Test the planned orientation, acceleration, tool center, cable route, and stop assumptions. A static lift is not enough when the cell includes fast motion or rotated handling.
3. Release and repeat run
Measure release timing, residual magnetism, placement tolerance, and repeatability across a small run. Use the result to freeze pole layout, interface, and quality-control notes.
Procurement Notes and Boundaries
The most common sourcing mistake is treating holding force as a fixed catalog value. In practice, eoat mass exceeds robot payload after adding adapter plate, cables, and workpiece. Calculate the full tooling stack mass and tool center of gravity against the robot datasheet before approving the EOAT concept. Another common issue is that cable route binds, rubs, or exceeds bend radius during robot motion. Map the cable path through the full robot envelope and verify clearance at every motion extreme before finalizing cable length and exit direction.
For a quote that can move from engineering review to procurement, include the workpiece file set, automation interface, cycle target, release requirement, quantity, destination, and any custom packaging or documentation needs. If those values are not final, mark them as assumptions so the quotation can separate confirmed scope from validation-dependent scope.
- Use Contact / RFQ when drawings, photos, robot model, and quantity are ready for review.
- Review sample validation and quality control if the application includes coating, oil, burrs, stack variation, or release precision risk.
Key Evaluation Matrix
| Metric | Typical Range | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| EOAT mass | Calculated with gripper, bracket, cable, and workpiece | Robot payload and moment checks must include the complete tooling stack. |
| Interface scope | Robot flange, plate, cable, connector, and controller | Clear interface scope prevents installation gaps during commissioning. |
RFQ Checklist
- Robot brand, model, payload class, flange standard, and controller generation
- Workpiece material, weight, pickup zone geometry, and surface condition
- Required adapter plate drawing or quick-change interface specification
- Cable exit direction, bend radius limits, connector type, and dress-pack constraints
- Quantity, project phase, delivery schedule, and any OEM branding or documentation needs
Risk Controls
- EOAT mass exceeds robot payload after adding adapter plate, cables, and workpiece.: Calculate the full tooling stack mass and tool center of gravity against the robot datasheet before approving the EOAT concept.
- Cable route binds, rubs, or exceeds bend radius during robot motion.: Map the cable path through the full robot envelope and verify clearance at every motion extreme before finalizing cable length and exit direction.
- Interface ownership is undefined, causing integration gaps at commissioning.: Document which party supplies the adapter plate, quick-change, cable, connector, controller, and sensor before purchase order.
Product Gallery
Buyer FAQ
What is included in a magnetic EOAT package?
It depends on the project scope. A basic package includes the magnetic module and pole face. A complete EOAT may add adapter plate, cable assembly, connector, controller interface, and documentation. Define the scope before comparing quotes.
Can the EOAT work with a quick-change system?
Yes, if the quick-change system can carry the EOAT mass and route the required power and signal connections. Send the quick-change model and available pass-through specifications for review.
How do you handle multi-robot or multi-station EOAT projects?
We review each station independently for workpiece, motion, and interface requirements, then optimize for shared components where possible. Send station layouts and part data for a consolidated review.
Related Resources
Inquiry Email
Include workpiece details, target holding force, quantity, and destination.